Truth is not a sentence.
Truth is a structure of evidence.
FineSchema does not simply answer whether a claim is true or false. It decomposes the claim, maps evidence, detects contradictions, evaluates source reliability, and outputs a justified truth state.
진실은 하나의 문장이 아니라 증거의 구조입니다. FineSchema는 주장을 쪼개고, 근거를 연결하고, 모순을 탐지하고, 출처 신뢰도를 평가해 가장 정당화된 진실 상태를 산출합니다.
From claim to justified state.
Click a node to inspect reliability, contradiction, and what stays uncertain.
The justified verdict, given everything above.
CONTESTED — the event is well supported; the command attribution is not.
Verified: village burned. Uncertain: who ordered it.
Held open — new primary evidence could move the state either way.
Nine justified states — never a binary verdict.
Strongly supported by multiple reliable and independent sources.
Well supported, but some uncertainty remains.
Evidence exists on multiple sides, and the claim remains disputed.
Some evidence supports the claim, but it is incomplete or low reliability.
The evidence suggests multiple plausible interpretations. FineSchema cannot responsibly reduce the judgment to one verdict.
Available evidence is insufficient for judgment.
The claim is contradicted by stronger evidence.
The claim appears invented, manipulated, or unsupported by credible evidence.
The reasoning contains a formal defect, unsafe inference, or invalid action logic.
A contested historical claim.
A fictional case — real, politically sensitive events are avoided in this version.
- Military dispatch from 1842 primary source
- Survivor testimony from 1845 primary source
- Government report from 1870 secondary source
- Enemy propaganda pamphlet low reliability
- Archaeological burn-pattern data physical evidence